BOMBAY PRESIDENCY
Bombay mint (1803-1824)
 

  Mohur                                            Description

 

* Metal: Gold
* Weight: 11.59 grms
* Diameter : 18 mm
* Mint : Bombay

* Obv : Julus formula See below *
* Rev : Regal title See below **

* Shape : Round
* Edge : Plain

P NO KM # MINT AH  RY AD DESCRIPTION  IMG
261 - bombay - - - Privy Mark D Crown normal img261bomGoldsml

  Mohur                                            Description

* Weight: 11.59 grms       * Diameter : 18 mm

262 - bombay - - -  Privy Mark D1 Crown Inverted Img262BombayGoldsml

  Mohur                                            Description

* Weight: 3.86 grms         * Diameter : 14.5 mm

263 - bombay - - - Privy Mark D Crown normal -

  Panchia                                         Description

* Weight: 3.86 grms         * Diameter : 14.5 mm

264 - bombay - - - Privy Mark D1 Crown Inverted -

  Rupee                                            Description

* Weight: 0.77 grms         * Diameter : 7 mm

265 - bombay - - - Privy mark No D2, Star in a place of crown.

NOTE:                  
                         
* Julus Formula * :   Zerb(mint) sanat RY julus maimanat manus
                                     Struck at (mint) in the (....) year of his reigen
                                     of tranquil prosperity.
* Regal title ** :       Sikka mubarak. Badshah ghazi
                                     Shah Alam
                                     = The auspicious coin of the victorious Emperor
                                     Shah Alam
* Privy Mark no D :   Marks 4 and 4a were used on the two larger
                                                             denominations mohur and panchia.
* Privy Mark no D1:  4a was evidently a die sinkers error resulting in
                                                             the crown appearing inverted.
* Privy Mark no D2:  Mark 4b occurs on the tiny gold rupee.
                                                             A crown punch of the size required for this
                                                             small piece would have resulted in a smudged
                                                             dot, or was not within the capability of the
                                                             engraver. Hence the use of a star mark.

 

Additional information